http://www.courtreference.com/court-reference-blog Court Records Access Sun, 08 Nov 2009 09:32:18 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1 hourly 1 http://www.courtreference.com/court-reference-blog/2009/03/06/contempt-of-court/comment-page-1/#comment-214 Kathy Fri, 23 Oct 2009 20:27:41 +0000 http://www.courtreference.com/court-reference-blog/?p=175#comment-214 My husband is in comtemp of court from the divorce proceedings. I took him to court and the judge upheld the agreement in the dissolution of marriage. He composed several pages stating the obligations of my previous husband, but my attorney led me to understand that it is unlikely it will be enforced. If that is the case, what is the purpose of the legal system? My husband is in comtemp of court from the divorce proceedings. I took him to court and the judge upheld the agreement in the dissolution of marriage. He composed several pages stating the obligations of my previous husband, but my attorney led me to understand that it is unlikely it will be enforced. If that is the case, what is the purpose of the legal system?

]]> http://www.courtreference.com/court-reference-blog/2008/04/04/whats-in-a-name-locating-name-change-records/comment-page-1/#comment-206 Jeff Mon, 28 Sep 2009 20:08:16 +0000 http://www.courtreference.com/court-reference-blog/2008/04/04/whats-in-a-name-locating-name-change-records/#comment-206 I had a name change when I was 12 years old in New York, and do not have the paperwork to prove it. Is there a way to claim those papers? I had a name change when I was 12 years old in New York, and do not have the paperwork to prove it. Is there a way to claim those papers?

]]> http://www.courtreference.com/court-reference-blog/2009/01/09/nuisance-claims/comment-page-1/#comment-194 StevenG Thu, 13 Aug 2009 20:19:51 +0000 http://www.courtreference.com/court-reference-blog/?p=146#comment-194 Secondhand tobacco smoke is a nuisance. Smokers do not seem to or want to, claim responsibilty for the gaseous toxic emissions they are creating and poisoning everyone in the immediate vicinity with. I think that the courts would support claims of nuisance for exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke and provide financial damages as compensation for the physical and detrimental health effects one derives from breathing it in. Secondhand tobacco smoke is a nuisance. Smokers do not seem to or want to, claim responsibilty for the gaseous toxic emissions they are creating and poisoning everyone in the immediate vicinity with. I think that the courts would support claims of nuisance for exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke and provide financial damages as compensation for the physical and detrimental health effects one derives from breathing it in.

]]>