http://www.courtreference.com/court-reference-blog/2009/01/09/nuisance-claims/ Court Records Access Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:08:32 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 http://www.courtreference.com/court-reference-blog/2009/01/09/nuisance-claims/comment-page-1/#comment-230 J Sun, 29 Nov 2009 07:00:13 +0000 http://www.courtreference.com/court-reference-blog/?p=146#comment-230 One neighbor's car stereo is so loud it vibrates my home whenever he drives by or sits in his driveway to listen to his music. Another neighbor has weekly parties where they are loud with their voices and with their music well past 10p. Buying a home was suppose to help rid ourselves of this kind of nuisance! After more than a year, it's time to look into filing complaints rather than calling the police to quiet them. We've been patient enough. One neighbor’s car stereo is so loud it vibrates my home whenever he drives by or sits in his driveway to listen to his music.
Another neighbor has weekly parties where they are loud with their voices and with their music well past 10p.
Buying a home was suppose to help rid ourselves of this kind of nuisance! After more than a year, it’s time to look into filing complaints rather than calling the police to quiet them. We’ve been patient enough.

]]> http://www.courtreference.com/court-reference-blog/2009/01/09/nuisance-claims/comment-page-1/#comment-194 StevenG Thu, 13 Aug 2009 20:19:51 +0000 http://www.courtreference.com/court-reference-blog/?p=146#comment-194 Secondhand tobacco smoke is a nuisance. Smokers do not seem to or want to, claim responsibilty for the gaseous toxic emissions they are creating and poisoning everyone in the immediate vicinity with. I think that the courts would support claims of nuisance for exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke and provide financial damages as compensation for the physical and detrimental health effects one derives from breathing it in. Secondhand tobacco smoke is a nuisance. Smokers do not seem to or want to, claim responsibilty for the gaseous toxic emissions they are creating and poisoning everyone in the immediate vicinity with. I think that the courts would support claims of nuisance for exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke and provide financial damages as compensation for the physical and detrimental health effects one derives from breathing it in.

]]>